MG3 1.5 COM vs MG3 1.5 COM Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
/
16
/
4113
/
1797
/
1502
/
2570
/
Fuel Economy
17.8
/
45
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
McPherson
/
Torison beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
195/55 R16
/
195/55 R16
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
/
109 BHP
/
CVT
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
/
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
/
Gasoline
/
109 BHP
/
140
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG3 1.5 COM
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
MG3 1.5 COM
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG3 1.5 COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG3 1.5 COM if you care more about overall equipment; choose MG3 1.5 COM if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG3 1.5 COM has a fuel consumption of 5.62, while MG3 1.5 COM has a fuel consumption of 5.62. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG3 1.5 COM has a wheelbase of 2570, while MG3 1.5 COM has a wheelbase of 2570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG3 1.5 COM uses Front Drive, while MG3 1.5 COM uses Front Drive.