MG3 1.5 COM vs Grand i10 1.2 Smart Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
16
/
4113
3995
1797
1680
1502
1510
2570
2450
/
1420
Fuel Economy
17.8
18.1
45
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
McPherson
/
Torison beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
195/55 R16
/
195/55 R16
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.0 L - 1.2 L
109 BHP
67 BHP - 84 BHP
CVT
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
109 BHP
83 BHP
140
114
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG3 1.5 COM
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Grand i10 1.2 Smart
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Practical and comfortable interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- The cost is moderate compared to the class
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- The storage space is small
- The interior material is not of high quality
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGrand i10 1.2 Smart
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG3 1.5 COM if you care more about interior space; choose Grand i10 1.2 Smart if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG3 1.5 COM has a fuel consumption of 5.62, while Grand i10 1.2 Smart has a fuel consumption of 5.52. Therefore, Grand i10 1.2 Smart is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG3 1.5 COM has a wheelbase of 2570, while Grand i10 1.2 Smart has a wheelbase of 2450. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MG3 1.5 COM, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG3 1.5 COM uses Front Drive, while Grand i10 1.2 Smart uses No data.