Monjaro GF+ 2.0T 4WD vs RAV4 2.5L Adventure Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
2490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4770 mm
4610 mm
1895 mm
1865 mm
1689 mm
1690 mm
2845 mm
2660 mm
562 L
/
210 m
/
Fuel Economy
8.5 Km/L
14.4 Km/L
62 L
55 L
8.5 Km/L
14.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
3-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
10
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
235 BHP - 238
170 - 219
Automatic
8 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT)
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
None
4
4
235 BHP
203 BHP
350 Nm
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Monjaro GF+ 2.0T 4WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
RAV4 2.5L Adventure
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and luxurious exterior design
- An elaborate interior with modern technologies
- Spacious and comfortable space inside the car
Negative
- Relatively rigid suspension affects comfort
- Noise insulation needs to be improved
- Storage design and details need to be developed
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Monjaro GF+ 2.0T 4WD if you care more about price; choose RAV4 2.5L Adventure if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Monjaro GF+ 2.0T 4WD has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while RAV4 2.5L Adventure has a fuel consumption of 6.94. Therefore, RAV4 2.5L Adventure is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Monjaro GF+ 2.0T 4WD has a wheelbase of 2845 mm, while RAV4 2.5L Adventure has a wheelbase of 2660 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Monjaro GF+ 2.0T 4WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Monjaro GF+ 2.0T 4WD uses Four Wheel Drive, while RAV4 2.5L Adventure uses Four Wheel Drive.