MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4850 mm
4440 mm
1870 mm
1833 mm
1875 mm
1560 mm
2855 mm
2700 mm
235 L
330 L
Fuel Economy
80 L
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.0 L
/
136 BHP - 190 BHP
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Diesel & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 - 7
/
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.8 L
Diesel
Gasoline
190 BHP
130 BHP
450 Nm
170 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) if you care more about interior space; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.