Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4712
4341 mm
1881
1804 mm
1597
1693 mm
2984
2676 mm
100+402
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
370
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
255 BHP - 487
105 BHP - 135 BHP
AT & DHT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 - 5
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
/
1.6 L
Electric
Gasoline
255 BHP
115 BHP
415
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMustang Mach-E 2025 Select
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select has a wheelbase of 2984, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select uses Rear Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.