Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
190
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4295
4.275
1760
1.765
1590
1.535
2620
2.570
432
240
Fuel Economy
15.4
15.4
41
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
118 BHP - 142 BHP
145 BHP - 148 BHP
Automatic & CVT
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
118 BHP
148 BHP
149
192
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
N/A
Comparison of configuration highlights
Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickNissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S has a wheelbase of 2620, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.