Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S vs MG ZS 2024 1.5L COM Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
170
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4295
4.314
1760
1.809
1590
1.624
2620
2.585
432
448
/
✓
Fuel Economy
15.4
17.2
41
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
118 BHP - 142 BHP
112 BHP - 168
Automatic & CVT
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1498 L
Gasoline
Petrol
118 BHP
112 BHP
149
150
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
MG ZS 2024 1.5L COM
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG ZS 2024 1.5L COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S if you care more about interior space; choose MG ZS 2024 1.5L COM if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while MG ZS 2024 1.5L COM has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, MG ZS 2024 1.5L COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S has a wheelbase of 2620, while MG ZS 2024 1.5L COM has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2024 1.5L COM uses Front Wheel Drive.