Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs 03T Comparison

Car Information

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

190

/

6

/

Dimensions

8

/

5046

/

1975

/

1795

/

2900

/

470

/

Fuel Economy

9.4

/

74

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

9AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

/

250 BHP - 271 BHP

422

9AT & Automatic & CVT

AT

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 - 8 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

/

Gasoline

/

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

/

271 @ 6,400

/

340

/

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • 03T

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
    • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
    • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

    Negative

    • Medium fuel economy
    • Traditional interior design needs updating
    • Noticeable noise during high speeds

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's Pick03T

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about overall equipment; choose 03T if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    VS

    Exeed | RX Luxury 2.0T

    Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    VS

    GAC | GS8 2.0T GT (4WD)

    Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    VS

    Hyundai | Hyundai Santa Fe 2022 3.5L GLS Premium+ (AWD)

    Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    VS

    Dodge | Durango GT Premium 3.6L V6

    Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    VS

    Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2019 3.6L Limited

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while 03T has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while 03T has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while 03T uses No data.