Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs RX Luxury 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
180 km/h
6
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
8
5 Seater
5046
4781 mm
1975
1920 mm
1795
1671 mm
2900
2815 mm
470
500 L
/
5 Doors
/
187 m
Fuel Economy
9.4
14 Km/L
74
55 L
/
14 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
14
Transmission
9AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
250 BHP - 271 BHP
245 HP - 261 BHP
9AT & Automatic & CVT
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
261 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
400 Nm
340 @ 4,800
/
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
RX Luxury 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about price; choose RX Luxury 2.0T if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while RX Luxury 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 7.14. Therefore, RX Luxury 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while RX Luxury 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while RX Luxury 2.0T uses All Wheel Drive.