Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
6
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
8
7 Seater
5046
5209
1975
2010
1795
1731
2900
3110
470
/
Fuel Economy
9.4
/
74
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Transmission
9AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
/
250 BHP - 271 BHP
429 BHP - 543 BHP
9AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 - 8
6 - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
320 km
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
429 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
600
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.