Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

8.0

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

Engine / Motor

190

/

6

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

8

7 Seater

5046

5209

1975

2010

1795

1731

2900

3110

470

/

Fuel Economy

9.4

/

74

/

Comfort

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Interior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Safety

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Infotainment

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

Transmission

9AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

✓

/

✓

✓

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

/

250 BHP - 271 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

9AT & Automatic & CVT

Automatic

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 - 8 Seater

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Exterior

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Engine

3.5 L

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

429 BHP

271 @ 6,400

/

340

600

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Exeed | RX Luxury 2.0T

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

GAC | GS8 2.0T GT (4WD)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Santa Fe 2022 3.5L GLS Premium+ (AWD)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Dodge | Durango GT Premium 3.6L V6

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2019 3.6L Limited

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.