Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs Nissan Patrol Safari 2024 Safari M/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
190
6
6
Dimensions
8
7 Seater
5046
5080
1975
1940
1795
1855
2900
2970
470
668
Fuel Economy
9.4
6.0
74
135
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
9AT
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
3.5 L
4.8 L
254 BHP - 271 BHP
280 BHP
9AT & Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
4.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
280 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
451
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Nissan Patrol Safari 2024 Safari M/T
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Long-term reliability
- Internal capacity and flexible fittings
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Vintage interior design
- Modest technology compared to competitors
Related comparisons
Editor's PickNissan Patrol Safari 2024 Safari M/T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Nissan Patrol Safari 2024 Safari M/T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Nissan Patrol Safari 2024 Safari M/T has a fuel consumption of 16.67. Therefore, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Nissan Patrol Safari 2024 Safari M/T has a wheelbase of 2970. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan Patrol Safari 2024 Safari M/T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Nissan Patrol Safari 2024 Safari M/T uses All Wheel Drive.