Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs V23 Comparison

Car Information

8.0

/

/

550

/

81.76

/

16.6

Engine / Motor

190

/

6

/

Dimensions

8

5

5046

4220

1975

1915

1795

1845

2900

2735

470

/

/

19

/

1613

/

1641

/

42

/

40

Fuel Economy

9.4

/

74

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

7

Transmission

9AT

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

255/55 R19

/

255/55 R19

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

/

250 BHP - 271 BHP

134

9AT & Automatic & CVT

AT

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 - 8 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

134

271 @ 6,400

/

340

/

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

180

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • V23

    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickV23

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about interior space; choose V23 if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Exeed | RX Luxury 2.0T

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

GAC | GS8 2.0T GT (4WD)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Santa Fe 2022 3.5L GLS Premium+ (AWD)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Dodge | Durango GT Premium 3.6L V6

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2019 3.6L Limited

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while V23 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while V23 has a wheelbase of 2735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while V23 uses No data.