Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) vs Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025 Comparison

Car Information

8.0

6.0

Engine / Motor

190

190

6

6

Dimensions

7

8

5046

5636

1975

2029

1795

1941

2900

3343

470

592

Fuel Economy

9.4

10.3

74

107

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

24

/

/

Active-X material seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

Dual Stage front airbags, frontseat side impact airbags,Safety Canopy (includes thirdrow)

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

13.2

/

/

6

Transmission

Automatic

10-Speed Selectshift Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

265/70 R18

/

265/70 R18

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

3.5 L - 5.4 L

250 BHP - 271 BHP

300 BHP - 440

9AT & Automatic & CVT

10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 8 Seater

6 Seater - 8

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

3.5

Gasoline

Gasoline

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

400

271 @ 6,400

/

340

650

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Reflectors
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Excellent towing ability
  • Comfort and ride quality

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is high
  • Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
  • The initial purchase price is high

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) if you care more about price; choose Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025 if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2023 3.6L V6 Sahara (2-Door)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Polestar | Polestar 2 2024 Long Range Single Motor

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Genesis | Genesis GV70 2023 2.5T Prestige

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2018 2.0T Prestige (250 PS)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2018 2.0T Pure (300 PS)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025 has a fuel consumption of 9.71. Therefore, Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) has a wheelbase of 2900, while Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025 has a wheelbase of 3343. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while Expedition Active Touring 4X2 2025 uses Rear Drive.