Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) vs Jaguar F Pace 2018 2.0T Pure (300 PS) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
233
6
4
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5046
4.746
1975
2.070
1795
1.693
2900
2.874
470
650
Fuel Economy
9.4
13.0
74
63
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L - 5.0 L
250 BHP - 271 BHP
246 BHP - 550 BHP
9AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
296 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
400
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
N/A
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Jaguar F Pace 2018 2.0T Pure (300 PS)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) if you care more about price; choose Jaguar F Pace 2018 2.0T Pure (300 PS) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Jaguar F Pace 2018 2.0T Pure (300 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Jaguar F Pace 2018 2.0T Pure (300 PS) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) has a wheelbase of 2900, while Jaguar F Pace 2018 2.0T Pure (300 PS) has a wheelbase of 2.874. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while Jaguar F Pace 2018 2.0T Pure (300 PS) uses All Wheel Drive.