Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) vs Mustang Mach-E GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
6
/
Dimensions
7
5
5046
4712
1975
1881
1795
1597
2900
2984
470
100+402
/
20
Fuel Economy
9.4
/
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
370
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Driver and Front-Passenger Dual-Stage, Driver Knee, Front-Seat Side-Impact, Rear-Seat Side-Impact, Side Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
B&O
/
15.5
/
✓
/
✓
/
10
Battery/Charging
/
Approx. 37 mins
/
150 kW
/
Approx. 14.0 hrs
/
10.5 kW
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Key Spec
3.5 L
/
254 BHP - 271 BHP
255 BHP - 487
9AT & Automatic
AT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 - 8
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
كهربائي
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
487
271 @ 6,400
/
340
950
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Whisper, Active, Untame, Untame Plus
/
✓
Motor
/
✓
/
2
/
Nickel Cobalt Manganese (NCM)
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Mustang Mach-E GT
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) if you care more about price; choose Mustang Mach-E GT if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Mustang Mach-E GT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) has a wheelbase of 2900, while Mustang Mach-E GT has a wheelbase of 2984. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mustang Mach-E GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while Mustang Mach-E GT uses Four-Wheel Drive.