Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD vs Grand Highlander Platinum Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
200 km/h
6
/
Dimensions
8
7 Seater
5046
5116 mm
1975
1989 mm
1795
1781 mm
2900
2964 mm
470
1639 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
9.4
9 Km/L
74
85 L
/
9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
3.5 L
2.4 L
254 BHP - 271 BHP
266 BHP
9AT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 8
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
266 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
420 Nm
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Grand Highlander Platinum
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGrand Highlander Platinum
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Grand Highlander Platinum if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Grand Highlander Platinum has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Grand Highlander Platinum has a wheelbase of 2964 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Highlander Platinum, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Grand Highlander Platinum uses All Wheel Drive.