Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD vs Porsche Macan 2018 2.0T Base Comparison

Car Information

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

190

229

6

4

Dimensions

8

5 Seater

5046

4697

1975

1923

1795

1624

2900

2807

470

500

Fuel Economy

9.4

13.9

74

65

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

3.5 L

2.0 L - 3.6 L

254 BHP - 271 BHP

245 BHP - 440 BHP

9AT & Automatic & CVT

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 8

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

248 BHP

271 @ 6,400

/

340

370

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Porsche Macan 2018 2.0T Base

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPorsche Macan 2018 2.0T Base

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD if you care more about interior space; choose Porsche Macan 2018 2.0T Base if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD

VS

Tesla | Model Y Rear-Wheel Drive

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Corsair 2023 2.0T Reserve

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Nautilus 2023 2.0T Premier (250 Hp)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Nautilus 2022 2.0T

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Nautilus 2021 2.0T (250 Hp)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Porsche Macan 2018 2.0T Base has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, Porsche Macan 2018 2.0T Base is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Porsche Macan 2018 2.0T Base has a wheelbase of 2807. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Porsche Macan 2018 2.0T Base uses All Wheel Drive.