Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD vs Prado TX-2 DSL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
6
/
Dimensions
8
7 Seater
5046
4990
1975
1940
1795
1984
2900
/
470
/
/
18
Fuel Economy
9.4
14.1
74
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Doors
/
✓
Interior
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
8
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
8-Speed Automatic Transmission
/
Central And Rear
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
245/70 R18
/
245/70 R18
Key Spec
3.5 L
2.4 L - 2.4 L
254 BHP - 271 BHP
201 - 267
9AT & Automatic & CVT
8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 8
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.8
Gasoline
Diesel
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
201
271 @ 6,400
/
340
500
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Prado TX-2 DSL
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD if you care more about price; choose Prado TX-2 DSL if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Prado TX-2 DSL has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, Prado TX-2 DSL is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Prado TX-2 DSL has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Prado TX-2 DSL uses All Wheel Drive.