CarteaCompare CarsNissan Z MT Performance 3.0L vs Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L

Nissan Z MT Performance 3.0L vs Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

260 km/h

260 km/h

6

6

2996 cc

2996 cc

GCC

GCC

Dimensions

2 Seater

2 Seater

2 Doors

2 Doors

4380 mm

4380 mm

1845 mm

1845 mm

1315 mm

1315 mm

2550 mm

2550 mm

125 mm

125 mm

Fuel Economy

9.5

9.5

62 L

62 L

8 Km/L

8 Km/L

Transmission

Manual

Auto

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Double-Wishbone

Double-Wishbone

Multi-Link Wishbone

Multi-Link Wishbone

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

Key Spec

3.0 L - 3.0 L

3.0 L - 3.0 L

400 BHP - 420 BHP

400 BHP - 420 BHP

Auto & Automatic & Manual

Auto & Automatic & Manual

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2 Seater - 4 Seater

2 Seater - 4 Seater

Engine

V

V

3.0 L

3.0 L

Petrol

Petrol

3.0-litre twin-turbo V6

3.0-litre twin-turbo V6

Twin Turbo

Twin Turbo

24

24

400 BHP

400 BHP

475 Nm

475 Nm

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Nissan Z MT Performance 3.0L

    • Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L

      Review Comparison

      Positive

      • Power performance V6 dual turbo engine
      • Attractive sporty and modern design
      • Good value for the price

      Negative

      • Limited interior space for rear seats
      • Small luggage storage capacity
      • The infotainment system is relatively old

      Positive

      • Power performance V6 dual turbo engine
      • Attractive sporty and modern design
      • Good value for the price

      Negative

      • Limited interior space for rear seats
      • Small luggage storage capacity
      • The infotainment system is relatively old

      Related comparisons

      Editor's PickNissan Z AT Performance 3.0L

      Expert / Editor Recommendation

      Choose Nissan Z MT Performance 3.0L if you care more about overall equipment; choose Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L if you care more about overall equipment.

      Popular Car Comparisons

      Nissan | Nissan Z MT Performance 3.0L

      VS

      Dodge | Challenger R/T 5.7L (375 HP)

      Nissan | Nissan Z MT Performance 3.0L

      VS

      Dodge | Challenger R/T Scatpack WideBody 6.2L

      Nissan | Nissan Z MT Performance 3.0L

      VS

      Dodge | Dodge Challenger 2024 5.7L R/T Plus

      Nissan | Nissan Z MT Performance 3.0L

      VS

      Ford | Ford Mustang 2024 5.0L V8 Fastback GT

      Nissan | Nissan Z MT Performance 3.0L

      VS

      Nissan | Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L

      Q&A

      • According to fuel consumption data, Nissan Z MT Performance 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 10.53, while Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
      • In terms of interior space, Nissan Z MT Performance 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2550 mm , while Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2550 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
      • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan Z MT Performance 3.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive , while Nissan Z AT Performance 3.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive .