Okavango 2025 GK vs Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
192
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
19
/
5 Doors
/
4860 mm
4395
1910 mm
1795
1770 mm
1562
2825 mm
2655
257 L
430
194 mm
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
16.7
52 L
48
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
3.5
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
PVC Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
218 - 218
153 HP - 155 BHP
7DCT & Automatic
6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
218
155 BHP
325 Nm
200
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Okavango 2025 GK
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Okavango 2025 GK if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Okavango 2025 GK has a fuel consumption of 10, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Okavango 2025 GK has a wheelbase of 2825 mm, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a wheelbase of 2655. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Okavango 2025 GK, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Okavango 2025 GK uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.