Optima 2.4L GDI vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
205 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4855 mm
4500
1860 mm
1842
1465 mm
1746
2805 mm
2670
450 L
/
/
Flush Door
/
18
/
5
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
16.6
70 L
/
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.5 L - 1.6 L
157 BHP - 265 BHP
154 - 197 BHP
AT & Automatic
6DCT AT & 7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission (DCT) & 7DCT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
185 BHP
197 BHP
241 Nm
290
/
1.6L TDGI
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Optima 2.4L GDI
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Tiggo7 Pro Max COM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickOptima 2.4L GDI
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Optima 2.4L GDI if you care more about price; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Optima 2.4L GDI has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Optima 2.4L GDI has a wheelbase of 2805 mm, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Optima 2.4L GDI, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Optima 2.4L GDI uses Front Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.