Pajero 3.8L 5 Door Mid vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
4900 mm
4771 mm
1875 mm
1870 mm
1870 mm
1828 mm
2780 mm
2790 mm
options.1,081 L
/
Fuel Economy
7.7 Km/L
10 Km/L
88 L
/
7.7 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.8 L
2.0 L
177 BHP - 250 BHP
215 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 9 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
3.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
243 BHP
215 BHP
327 Nm
280 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pajero 3.8L 5 Door Mid
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pajero 3.8L 5 Door Mid if you care more about overall equipment; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pajero 3.8L 5 Door Mid has a fuel consumption of 12.99, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pajero 3.8L 5 Door Mid has a wheelbase of 2780 mm, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pajero 3.8L 5 Door Mid uses All Wheel Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.