Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top vs 11 AWD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

190 km/h

200 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

5080 mm

4880 mm

1940 mm

1970 mm

1855 mm

1601 mm

2970 mm

2975 mm

668 L

545 L

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

6 Km/L

/

135 L

/

6 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Vinyl Upholstery

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Sports

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

10.25

/

/

/

/

Standard LCD

/

/

Transmission

Manual

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

4.8 L

/

280 BHP

570 BHP - 599 BHP

Automatic & Manual

TBD

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 Seater

5 Seater

/

TBD

/

650 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

4.8 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

280 BHP

599 BHP

451 Nm

650 Nm

Motor

/

13.5

/

options.Lithium

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

    • ABS
  • 11 AWD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Strong off-road performance
  • Long-term reliability
  • Internal capacity and flexible fittings

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Vintage interior design
  • Modest technology compared to competitors

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPatrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top if you care more about price; choose 11 AWD if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Honda | CRV Touring (AWD) 2025

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Kia | Kia Telluride 2023 3.8L V6 EX (AWD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Kia | Kia Sorento 2024 3.5L EX1 (AWD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Maxus | D90 Pro Executive Luxury 4WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 16.67, while 11 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while 11 AWD has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 11 AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while 11 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.