Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5080 mm
4760 mm
1940 mm
1930 mm
1855 mm
1927 mm
2970 mm
2750 mm
668 L
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
6 Km/L
10 Km/L
135 L
75 L
6 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.8 L
2.0 L
280 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
280 BHP
224 BHP
451 Nm
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top
- ABS
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Long-term reliability
- Internal capacity and flexible fittings
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Vintage interior design
- Modest technology compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 16.67, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, 300 Challenger 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.