Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
191 km/h
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5080 mm
4583 mm
1940 mm
2008 mm
1855 mm
1969 mm
2970 mm
2587 mm
668 L
397 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
6 Km/L
10 Km/L
135 L
88 L
6 Km/L
10 Km/L
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
Manual
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.8 L
2.0 L - 5 L
280 BHP
300 BHP - 635
Automatic & Manual
8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
4.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
280 BHP
300 BHP
451 Nm
400 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
Comparison of configuration highlights
Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top
- ABS
Defender 90 SE (P300)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Long-term reliability
- Internal capacity and flexible fittings
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Vintage interior design
- Modest technology compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPatrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top if you care more about price; choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 16.67, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Defender 90 SE (P300) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive.