CarteaCompare CarsPatrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top vs G6 RWD Standard Range

Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top vs G6 RWD Standard Range Comparison

Car Information

/

435 km

/

66 kWh

Engine / Motor

190 km/h

200

Dimensions

7 Seater

5

5080 mm

4753

1940 mm

1920

1855 mm

1650

2970 mm

2890

668 L

571L (1,374L with rear seats folded)

/

2025

/

19

/

5

Fuel Economy

6 Km/L

/

135 L

/

6 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

Interior

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

10.2

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Digital

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

7

/

/

/

Front and Rear

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

14.96

/

/

/

/

/

/

18

Battery/Charging

/

CCS2

/

20min = 10-80% SOC

/

215

/

7.5(5-100%)

Transmission

Manual

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

/

Double Wishbone Independent Suspension

/

Rear Multi-link Independent Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

Key Spec

4.8 L

/

280 BHP

280 BHP - 470 BHP

Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

435 - 570

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

4.8 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

280 BHP

280 BHP

451 Nm

/

Motor

/

440

/

1

/

175

/

LFP

/

Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

/

210

/

280

Technologies

/

/

5

/

12

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

    • ABS
  • G6 RWD Standard Range

    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Remote key types
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Strong off-road performance
  • Long-term reliability
  • Internal capacity and flexible fittings

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Vintage interior design
  • Modest technology compared to competitors

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickG6 RWD Standard Range

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top if you care more about interior space; choose G6 RWD Standard Range if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Honda | CRV Touring (AWD) 2025

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Kia | Kia Telluride 2023 3.8L V6 EX (AWD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Kia | Kia Sorento 2024 3.5L EX1 (AWD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Maxus | D90 Pro Executive Luxury 4WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 16.67, while G6 RWD Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while G6 RWD Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2890. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while G6 RWD Standard Range uses Rear Drive.