CarteaCompare CarsPatrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top vs G9 RWD Standard Range

Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top vs G9 RWD Standard Range Comparison

Car Information

/

6.6

/

460 kM

/

78.2 kWh

Engine / Motor

190 km/h

200

Dimensions

7 Seater

5

5080 mm

4891

1940 mm

1937

1855 mm

1680

2970 mm

2998

668 L

660/1576 Front Trunk 71L

/

2235

/

19

/

5

Fuel Economy

6 Km/L

/

135 L

/

6 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Electric

Interior

/

/

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

10.25

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Digital

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

7

/

/

/

Front And Rear

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

14.96

/

14.96

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

Battery/Charging

/

CCS2

/

20min = 10-80% SOC

/

up to 260

/

≥9h

Transmission

Manual

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

/

Double Wishbone Independent Suspension

/

Multi-link Independent Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

/

255/55R19

/

255/55R19

Key Spec

4.8 L

/

280 BHP

310 BHP

Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

460

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

4.8 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

280 BHP

310 BHP

451 Nm

/

Motor

/

430

/

1

/

LFP

/

Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

/

230

/

310

Technologies

/

/

5

/

12

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

    • ABS
  • G9 RWD Standard Range

    • Power Tailgate
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Heater
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Front Cross Traffic Alert
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Strong off-road performance
  • Long-term reliability
  • Internal capacity and flexible fittings

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Vintage interior design
  • Modest technology compared to competitors

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPatrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top if you care more about price; choose G9 RWD Standard Range if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Honda | CRV Touring (AWD) 2025

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Kia | Kia Telluride 2023 3.8L V6 EX (AWD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Kia | Kia Sorento 2024 3.5L EX1 (AWD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Maxus | D90 Pro Executive Luxury 4WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 16.67, while G9 RWD Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while G9 RWD Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2998. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G9 RWD Standard Range, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while G9 RWD Standard Range uses Rear Drive.