Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top vs Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

190 km/h

216 km/h

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

5080 mm

4371 mm

1940 mm

1996 mm

1855 mm

1649 mm

2970 mm

2681 mm

668 L

472 L

Fuel Economy

6 Km/L

13.5 Km/L

135 L

67 L

6 Km/L

13.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

Safety

Transmission

Manual

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

4.8 L

2.0 L

280 BHP

200 BHP - 250 BHP

Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

Engine

4.8 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

280 BHP

200 BHP

451 Nm

320 Nm

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

    • ABS
  • Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Strong off-road performance
  • Long-term reliability
  • Internal capacity and flexible fittings

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Vintage interior design
  • Modest technology compared to competitors

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPatrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top if you care more about price; choose Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Honda | CRV Touring (AWD) 2025

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX9 2019 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Kia | Kia Telluride 2023 3.8L V6 EX (AWD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Kia | Kia Sorento 2024 3.5L EX1 (AWD)

Nissan | Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top

VS

Maxus | D90 Pro Executive Luxury 4WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of 16.67, while Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD has a wheelbase of 2681 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Safari M/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD uses All Wheel Drive.