Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top vs IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD Comparison

Car Information

/

3.5

/

710

/

103

Engine / Motor

190 km/h

252

Dimensions

7 Seater

5

5080 mm

4937

1940 mm

1988

1855 mm

1671

2970 mm

2980

668 L

617–1,833 L

/

2385

/

20"

Fuel Economy

135 L

/

Comfort

/

/

Interior

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

/

/

30–80% in around 17 min

Transmission

Manual

1-speed automatic / fixed-ratio EV gearbox

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

/

AWD

/

Double wishbone independent suspension

/

Multi-link independent suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated discs

/

Ventilated discs

/

235/50 R20

/

235/50 R20

Key Spec

4.8 L

/

280 BHP

671

Automatic & Manual

1-speed automatic / fixed-ratio EV gearbox

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

7 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Engine

4.8 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

280 BHP

671

451 Nm

800

Exterior

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

Ternary NMC

Technologies

/

3

/

12

/

1

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    • IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD

      • Power Tailgate
      • 360 Degree Camera
      • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
      • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
      • Child Safety Monitoring System
      • Lane Following Assist
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
      • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Child Lock
      • Active braking
      • Lane Departure Warning
      • Lane Keeping Assist
      • Seat belt reminder

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Suitable for long road trips
    • Durability and endurance
    • Spacious and comfortable interior

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption
    • Limited entertainment technologies
    • High maintenance costs

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickPatrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top if you care more about price; choose IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD if you care more about interior space.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Nissan | Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    VS

    Honda | Honda Pilot 2023 3.5 Special Edition (AWD)

    Nissan | Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    VS

    Xpeng | G6 RWD Long Range

    Nissan | Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    VS

    Denza | B5 Deluxe

    Nissan | Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    VS

    Honda | Honda Pilot 2023 3.5 EX (2WD)

    Nissan | Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    VS

    Mazda | Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of No data, while IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD has a wheelbase of 2980. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD uses Four-Wheel Drive.