CarteaCompare CarsPatrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top vs Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)

Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top vs Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

/

8.4

/

Engine / Motor

190 km/h

210

/

4

Dimensions

7 Seater

7 Seater

5080 mm

5.075

1940 mm

1.969

1855 mm

1.716

2970 mm

2.930

668 L

407

/

Fuel Economy

135 L

74

/

11.8

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Manual

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

4.8 L

2.5 L - 3.7 L

280 BHP

226 BHP - 273 BHP

Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

7 Seater

Engine

4.8 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Petrol

280 BHP

230 BHP

451 Nm

420

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

N/A

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    • Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)

      • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
      • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • Rear Defogger
      • Push Button Start
      • Temperature Display
      • Keyless Entry
      • Welcome Light
      • Rear Camera
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Number of Airbags
      • Rollover stability control
      • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
      • Collision Detection
      • Blind Spot Warning
      • Crash Auto Door Unlock
      • Auto Door Lock
      • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • ABS
      • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
      • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Active braking
      • Lane Departure Warning

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Suitable for long road trips
    • Durability and endurance
    • Spacious and comfortable interior

    Negative

    • High fuel consumption
    • Limited entertainment technologies
    • High maintenance costs

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickPatrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Nissan | Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    VS

    Honda | Honda Pilot 2023 3.5 Special Edition (AWD)

    Nissan | Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    VS

    Xpeng | G6 RWD Long Range

    Nissan | Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    VS

    Denza | B5 Deluxe

    Nissan | Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    VS

    Honda | Honda Pilot 2023 3.5 EX (2WD)

    Nissan | Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top

    VS

    Mazda | Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX9 2020 2.5T Signature Edition (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.