Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top vs Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
206 km/h
/
4
/
1984 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5080 mm
4485 mm
1940 mm
1856 mm
1855 mm
1585 mm
2970 mm
2680 mm
668 L
530 L
/
5 Doors
/
170 m
Fuel Economy
135 L
60 L
/
11 Km/L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Manual
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.8 L
1.4 L - 2.0 L
280 BHP
150 BHP - 180 BHP
Automatic & Manual
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Engine
4.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
280 BHP
180 BHP
451 Nm
320 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top
Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Suitable for long road trips
- Durability and endurance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited entertainment technologies
- High maintenance costs
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top if you care more about price; choose Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of No data, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.