Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top vs RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190 km/h
280 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5080 mm
4507 mm
1940 mm
1851 mm
1855 mm
1557 mm
2970 mm
2681 mm
668 L
530 L
Fuel Economy
135 L
64 L
/
14.9 Km/L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Manual
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.8 L
2.5 L
280 BHP
400 BHP
Automatic & Manual
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Engine
4.8 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
280 BHP
400 BHP
451 Nm
480 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top
RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Suitable for long road trips
- Durability and endurance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited entertainment technologies
- High maintenance costs
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPatrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top if you care more about price; choose RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top has a fuel consumption of No data, while RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top has a wheelbase of 2970 mm, while RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a wheelbase of 2681 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Patrol Safari Super Safari M/T Hard Top uses All Wheel Drive, while RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback uses All Wheel Drive.