PATROL SE T2 vs Traverse 3.6L LT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
208 km/h
Dimensions
8 Seater
8 Seater
18
/
5350
5189 mm
2030
1996 mm
1945
1795 mm
3075
3071 mm
244
/
/
5 Doors
/
651 L
Fuel Economy
/
11.1 Km/L
97
73 L
/
11.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
Monolith Display
/
Driver Seat
/
Leatherette
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Front+Side+Curtain+Driver Knee
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
9
/
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Electric Power Steering
/
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
265/70 R18
/
265/70 R18
/
Key Spec
3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)
2.5 T - 3.6 L
275 BHP - 495 BHP
281 BHP - 328 BHP
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
8 Speed AT & Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
7 Seater - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.8 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
3.8-LITER DOHC, V6, CVTCS DIG ENGINE
/
316 BHP
310 BHP
386
361 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
ROCK, SAND, ECO, MUD, STANDARD, SPORT
/
✓
/
Auto
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
PATROL SE T2
- Power Tailgate
- Cool Box
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
Traverse 3.6L LT (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose PATROL SE T2 if you care more about interior space; choose Traverse 3.6L LT (FWD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, PATROL SE T2 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Traverse 3.6L LT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, PATROL SE T2 has a wheelbase of 3075, while Traverse 3.6L LT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 3071 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, PATROL SE T2, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. PATROL SE T2 uses No data, while Traverse 3.6L LT (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.