Poer 2.0T Platinum (4WD) vs Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x4 (A/T) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
177 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5410 mm
5330 mm
1934 mm
1963 mm
1886 mm
1897 mm
3230 mm
3180 mm
Fuel Economy
80 L
80 L
/
9.1 Km/L
/
9.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
2.4 L
188 - 188
210 BHP
8AT & AT8 & Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
188 BHP
210 BHP
360 Nm
320 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Poer 2.0T Platinum (4WD)
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x4 (A/T)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickLandtrek 2.4T DC 4x4 (A/T)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Poer 2.0T Platinum (4WD) if you care more about interior space; choose Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x4 (A/T) if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Poer 2.0T Platinum (4WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x4 (A/T) has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Poer 2.0T Platinum (4WD) has a wheelbase of 3230 mm, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x4 (A/T) has a wheelbase of 3180 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Poer 2.0T Platinum (4WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Poer 2.0T Platinum (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x4 (A/T) uses All Wheel Drive.