Q3 35 TFSI vs 3008 1.6T GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
222 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4385 mm
4447 mm
2019 mm
1841 mm
1608 mm
1624 mm
2603 mm
2675 mm
460 L
520 L
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
15.4 Km/L
58 L
53 L
15.4 Km/L
15.4 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 1.6 L
150 BHP - 220 BHP
156 BHP - 300 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 6 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
181 BHP
250 Nm
250 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Q3 35 TFSI
- ABS
3008 1.6T GT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and distinctive exterior design
- High quality and luxurious interior
- Advanced and convenient driving techniques
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Suspension needs improvement in comfort
- The price is considered relatively high
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQ3 35 TFSI
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Q3 35 TFSI if you care more about price; choose 3008 1.6T GT if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Q3 35 TFSI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while 3008 1.6T GT has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Q3 35 TFSI has a wheelbase of 2603 mm, while 3008 1.6T GT has a wheelbase of 2675 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 3008 1.6T GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q3 35 TFSI uses Front Wheel Drive, while 3008 1.6T GT uses Front Wheel Drive.