Q3 35 TFSI vs Captiva LS Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4385 mm
/
2019 mm
/
1608 mm
/
2603 mm
/
460 L
1051L
/
18
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
/
58 L
/
15.4 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Interior
/
3.5
/
✓
/
diagonal display
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
2 Front and sides
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
/
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
Mcpherson
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L - 3.0 L
150 BHP - 220 BHP
144 BHP - 264 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
HALOGEN
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.4 L
1.5 T
Gasoline
Gasoline
150 BHP
144 BHP
250 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Q3 35 TFSI
- ABS
Captiva LS
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCaptiva LS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Q3 35 TFSI if you care more about power; choose Captiva LS if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Q3 35 TFSI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Captiva LS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Q3 35 TFSI has a wheelbase of 2603 mm, while Captiva LS has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q3 35 TFSI uses Front Wheel Drive, while Captiva LS uses Front Wheel Drive.