Q3 35 TFSI vs Tank 300 Challenger Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

206 km/h

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4385 mm

4760

2019 mm

1930

1608 mm

1927

2603 mm

2750

460 L

400 L

/

5 Doors

/

224

Fuel Economy

15.4 Km/L

12.1

58 L

75 L

15.4 Km/L

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

265/65 R17

/

265/65 R17

Key Spec

1.4 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L

150 BHP - 220 BHP

223 BHP - 342 BHP

Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.4 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

150 BHP

224 BHP

250 Nm

387 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Q3 35 TFSI

    • ABS
  • Tank 300 Challenger

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTank 300 Challenger

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Q3 35 TFSI if you care more about fuel economy; choose Tank 300 Challenger if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | Q3 35 TFSI

VS

Exeed | VX Flagship 2.0T

Audi | Q3 35 TFSI

VS

Exeed | Exeed VX 2023 2.0T-GDI Flagship

Audi | Q3 35 TFSI

VS

Exeed | Exeed VX 2024 2.0T-GDI Flagship

Audi | Q3 35 TFSI

VS

Peugeot | 3008 1.6T GT

Audi | Q3 35 TFSI

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Q3 35 TFSI has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Tank 300 Challenger has a fuel consumption of 8.26. Therefore, Q3 35 TFSI is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Q3 35 TFSI has a wheelbase of 2603 mm, while Tank 300 Challenger has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tank 300 Challenger, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q3 35 TFSI uses Front Wheel Drive, while Tank 300 Challenger uses Four Wheel Drive.