Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) vs CRV DX (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4385 mm
4706 mm
2019 mm
1866 mm
1608 mm
1681 mm
2603 mm
2700 mm
460 L
375 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.5 Km/L
11 Km/L
58 L
58 L
14.5 Km/L
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L - 2.4 L
150 BHP - 220 BHP
184 BHP - 190
Automatic & Manual
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
180 BHP
190 BHP
320 Nm
243 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
CRV DX (2WD)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCRV DX (2WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) if you care more about fuel economy; choose CRV DX (2WD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.9, while CRV DX (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) has a wheelbase of 2603 mm, while CRV DX (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CRV DX (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive, while CRV DX (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.