Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4385 mm
4341 mm
2019 mm
1804 mm
1608 mm
1693 mm
2603 mm
2676 mm
460 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
14.5 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
58 L
50 L
14.5 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
150 BHP - 220 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
180 BHP
115 BHP
320 Nm
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.9, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) has a wheelbase of 2603 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.