Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) vs EREV RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4385 mm
4,825
2019 mm
1,980
1608 mm
1,620
2603 mm
2,940
460 L
/
Fuel Economy
14.5 Km/L
/
58 L
/
14.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
150 BHP - 220 BHP
310 - 590
Automatic & Manual
AT & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic.
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
180 BHP
310
320 Nm
367
/
1,152
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EREV RWD
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQ3 40 TFSI (180 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) if you care more about price; choose EREV RWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.9, while EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) has a wheelbase of 2603 mm, while EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EREV RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive, while EREV RWD uses No data.