Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) vs X50 LUX Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4385 mm
/
2019 mm
/
1608 mm
/
2603 mm
/
460 L
/
/
17
Fuel Economy
14.5 Km/L
/
58 L
/
14.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
4
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
6-DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
1.5 L
150 BHP - 220 BHP
154 BHP - 156
Automatic & Manual
6-DCT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
180 BHP
154 BHP
320 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
X50 LUX
- Keyless Entry
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Advanced technologies for security systems
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average fuel efficiency
- The availability of spare parts can be limited
- Less dynamic driving experience
Related comparisons
Editor's PickX50 LUX
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) if you care more about overall equipment; choose X50 LUX if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.9, while X50 LUX has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) has a wheelbase of 2603 mm, while X50 LUX has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q3 40 TFSI (180 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive, while X50 LUX uses No data.