Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD vs EV5 2WD-LIGHTSHORT RANGE-11 Comparison

Car Information

/

8.5 sec

/

310

/

400 km

/

64.2

Engine / Motor

206 km/h

/

4

/

1984 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

4485 mm

4615

1856 mm

1875

1585 mm

1715

2680 mm

2750

530 L

/

170 m

/

/

18

Fuel Economy

11 Km/L

/

60 L

/

11 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

Cloth & Leather

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

12.3

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

7

/

/

/

/

Rear Occupant Alert W/O Sensor

Infotainment

9

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

8 Speed AT

/

E-SHIFT (SBW)

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

MOTOR DRIVEN POWER STEERING

Wheels/brakes

/

225/60 R18

/

225/60 R18

Key Spec

1.4 L - 2.0 L

/

150 BHP - 180 BHP

214 BHP - 718

TBD

Automatic & E-SHIFT (SBW)

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

Single

Gasoline

Electric

Single Turbo

/

4

/

180 BHP

214 BHP

320 Nm

310 Nm

/

Single

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • EV5 2WD-LIGHTSHORT RANGE-11

    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEV5 2WD-LIGHTSHORT RANGE-11

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD if you care more about overall equipment; choose EV5 2WD-LIGHTSHORT RANGE-11 if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD

VS

Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

Audi | Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD

VS

Jeep | Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

Audi | Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD

VS

Toyota | Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T

Audi | Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD

VS

Toyota | Prado Adventure Mono Tone 2.4T

Audi | Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD

VS

Hyundai | Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while EV5 2WD-LIGHTSHORT RANGE-11 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while EV5 2WD-LIGHTSHORT RANGE-11 has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EV5 2WD-LIGHTSHORT RANGE-11, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD uses Front Wheel Drive, while EV5 2WD-LIGHTSHORT RANGE-11 uses No data.