Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD vs Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
206 km/h
220 km/h
4
6
1984 cc
3598 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
4 Doors
4485 mm
5539 mm
1856 mm
1875 mm
1585 mm
1857 mm
2680 mm
3487 mm
530 L
1005 L
170 m
254 m
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
11 Km/L
60 L
83 L
11 Km/L
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Single
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
9
12
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
9
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.4 L - 2.0 L
3.6 L
150 BHP - 180 BHP
285 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
4
180 BHP
285 BHP
320 Nm
352 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD if you care more about overall equipment; choose Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L has a wheelbase of 3487 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L uses All Wheel Drive.