Qin Plus FWD vs B70 Premium Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
1500
1440
17
18
4
/
4765
4810
1837
1840
1495
1455
2720
/
500
/
Fuel Economy
26
17
48
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
8.8
7
LCD
LCD
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
Leather
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
Driver & Passenger Front and Side Airbags, Front & Rear Integrated Side Safety Curtain Airbag
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
225/50 R18
215/55 R17
225/50 R18
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.5 T - 2.0 T
177 BHP - 197 BHP
168 - 214
Automatic
6AT & 7DCT & Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 T
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
168 BHP
325
258
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
B70 Premium
- 360 Degree Camera
- Heater
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about price; choose B70 Premium if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85, while B70 Premium has a fuel consumption of 5.88. Therefore, Qin Plus FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720, while B70 Premium has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive, while B70 Premium uses Front Drive.