Qin Plus FWD vs GAC Empow 1.5T GL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
200 km/h
/
4
/
1497 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
1500
/
17
/
4
4 Doors
4765
4700 mm
1837
1850 mm
1495
1432 mm
2720
2730 mm
500
480 L
/
120 mm
Fuel Economy
26
/
48
50 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
Leather
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
Standard LCD
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
7WDCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
Torsion Beam
Multi-Link Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
177 BHP - 197 BHP
170 BHP - 1497 BHP
Automatic
7-Speed DCT & 7WDCT
Hybrid
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Petrol
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
1497 BHP
325
250 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
GAC Empow 1.5T GL
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Dynamic and attractive design
- Powerful performance and high efficiency
- Provides advanced technologies and comprehensive security
Negative
- Limited storage space at the back
- Infotainment interface needs minor improvements
- Rear seats may be cramped for some passengers
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about price; choose GAC Empow 1.5T GL if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85, while GAC Empow 1.5T GL has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720, while GAC Empow 1.5T GL has a wheelbase of 2730 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GAC Empow 1.5T GL, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive, while GAC Empow 1.5T GL uses Front Wheel Drive .