Qin Plus FWD vs Ciciv SPORT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
200
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
1500
/
17
/
4
/
4765
4689
1837
1801
1495
1415
2720
,735
500
/
Fuel Economy
26
/
48
47
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.5 L - 2.0 L
177 BHP - 197 BHP
123 BHP - 180 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
150
325
181
/
112
/
6400
/
5000
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Ciciv SPORT
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Driving Recorder
- Security System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about price; choose Ciciv SPORT if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85, while Ciciv SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720, while Ciciv SPORT has a wheelbase of ,735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Qin Plus FWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive, while Ciciv SPORT uses No data.