Qin Plus FWD vs CT4 Luxury 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
250 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
American
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
1500
/
17
/
4
4 Doors
4765
4754 mm
1837
1973 mm
1495
1422 mm
2720
2776 mm
500
302 L
/
100 m
Fuel Economy
26
9.7 Km/L
48
64 L
/
9.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
Leather
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
8
✓
✓
✓
/
6
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
2.0 L - 3.6 L
177 BHP - 197 BHP
237 BHP - 472 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED with Halogen
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
237 BHP
325
350 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
CT4 Luxury 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about price; choose CT4 Luxury 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85, while CT4 Luxury 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10.31. Therefore, Qin Plus FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720, while CT4 Luxury 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2776 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CT4 Luxury 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive, while CT4 Luxury 2.0T uses Rear Wheel Drive.