Qin Plus FWD vs ET5 Standard Range Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
1500
/
17
/
4
4 Doors
4765
4790
1837
1960
1495
1499
2720
2888 mm
500
options. L
/
options. mm
Fuel Economy
26
/
48
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
Leather
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L
/
177 BHP - 197 BHP
320 BHP
Automatic
AT
Hybrid
Electric
TBD
/
5
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
/
Hybrid
Electric
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
320 BHP
325
550 Nm
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
ET5 Standard Range
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Power Outlet
- Steering Adjustment
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active Safety Warning System
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Futuristic and distinctive exterior design
- Advanced technological configuration
- Exceptional driving performance and dynamics
Negative
- Higher pricing
- Incomplete after-sales service network
- Areas for improvement in detail craftsmanship
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about price; choose ET5 Standard Range if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85, while ET5 Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720, while ET5 Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ET5 Standard Range, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive, while ET5 Standard Range uses All Wheel Drive .