Qin Plus FWD vs J7 Luxury Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
170
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
1500
1410
17
17
4
5
4765
4772
1837
1820
1495
1490
2720
/
500
520
/
155
Fuel Economy
26
14.9 Km/L
48
45
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
Dual front airbags, Front seats side airbags, Side curtain airbags
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
10.4
✓
/
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
McPherson Independent
Torsion Beam
Multi-link independent
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
Disc
Disc
Disc
215/55 R17
215/50 R17
215/55 R17
215/50 R17
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.5 L
177 BHP - 197 BHP
150 BHP
Automatic
CVT
Hybrid
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5
Exterior
Manual
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
150 BHP
325
210
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
J7 Luxury
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Security System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Comfortable interior distribution and modern technologies
- Balanced performance between power and fuel consumption
Negative
- Internal materials are not at the level of competitors
- The suspension is relatively rigid on unpaved roads
- The reactions of the intelligence system are not always smooth
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about price; choose J7 Luxury if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85, while J7 Luxury has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, Qin Plus FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720, while J7 Luxury has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive, while J7 Luxury uses No data.