Qin Plus FWD vs Seal 7 2025 Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
180
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
1500
/
17
18
4
/
4765
4980
1837
1890
1495
1495
2720
2900
500
465
Fuel Economy
26
16.1
48
50
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
8.8
8.8
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
Front Driver & Passenger Seats & Side Airbags
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
12.8
✓
/
✓
/
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
6.6
6.6
Transmission
Automatic
E-CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
MacPherson
Macpherson
Torsion Beam
Multi-link
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
225/50 R18
215/55 R17
225/50 R18
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.5
177 BHP - 197 BHP
270 BHP
Automatic
E-CVT
Hybrid
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
5
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5
Hybrid
Hybrid
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
270 BHP
325
231
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Seal 7 2025 Design
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- Fast dynamic performance and smooth driving
- Advanced interior technologies and luxurious experience
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Charging networks are insufficient in some areas
- Interior comfort is affected by rigid suspension and noise
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about price; choose Seal 7 2025 Design if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85, while Seal 7 2025 Design has a fuel consumption of 6.21. Therefore, Qin Plus FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720, while Seal 7 2025 Design has a wheelbase of 2900. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Seal 7 2025 Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive, while Seal 7 2025 Design uses Front Drive.